"the shock doctrine"...."is a philosophy that holds that the best way, the best time, to push through radical free market ideas is in the aftermath of a major shock. That shock could be ....a natural disaster....a terrorist attack....or an economic meltdown."
One year later, 10 days after the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008, Klein commented on the emergency actions to stem the spread of the financial crisis, including the $85bln rescue and takeover of AIG by the US government:
"Whatever the events of this week mean, nobody should believe the overblown claims that the market crisis signals the death of 'free market' ideology.....The massive debts the public is accumulating to bail out the speculators will then become part of a global budget crisis that will be the rationalisation for deep cuts to social programmes, and for a renewed push to privatise what is left of the public sector."
Doesn't that sound eerily, scarily familiar in the midst of the eurozone crisis ?
Haven't events evolved exactly as Naomi Klein predicted 4 years ago, including the convenient interpretation of the eurozone crisis as a public debt crisis instead of a financial crisis 2.0 ?
And isn't it a fact that, instead of cleaning up Europe's banking sector and going after the billions of Euros stacked away by financial speculators, the so-called sovereign debt crisis has been presented as a consequence of people living 'above their means' and thus, as a justification to punish innocent people with drastic cuts in public social programs, pensions and wages, as well as staff reductions and privatizations of public sector enterprises and services ?
If you answered 'yes' to all three questions, you are ready to arrive at a correct diagnosis of the eurozone crisis as well as a consequential path toward a solution.
......more on this in upcoming posts
No comments:
Post a Comment